Monday, March 9, 2009
Abortion Morality
Although abortion is illegal in Brazil judges can make exceptions if the mother's life is in danger or the fetus has no chance of survival. After hearing reports from the child's doctor a judge approved it and an abortion was performed. Fatima Maia, director of the public university hospital where the abortion was performed, said the 15-week-old pregnancy posed a serious risk to the 36-kilogram girl. It's a sad and unfortunate situation that ended in the termination two fetal lives.
Enter the Brazilian archbishop, Jose Cardoso Sobrinho, who excommunicated all the people involved in the abortion, the girl's mother and the doctors included. The nine year old girl herself was spared, as being too young. The stepfather was not excommunicated because the church said that his action, although deplorable, was not as bad as ending the life of a fetus.
Marcio Miranda, a lawyer for the Archdiocese of Olinda and Recife in northeastern Brazil, clarified the Churches position by stating that the girl should have carried the fetuses to term and had a cesarean section despite the risk.
When hearing of the excommunication, Brazil's president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, lashed out at the archbishop in outrage. Silva said that it was clear the doctors saved the girl's life by performing the abortion. The excommunications are, no doubt, just the result of the archbishop's "conservative attitude."
I see the Church's public excommunications as dramatic demonstration of their desire to exert power and authority over their followers. The church figuratively puts "heads on pikes" to make it clear to Church followers they depend on the Church for their salvation. This is not subtle persuasion but outright extortion. It demonstrates just how out of touch
But in times of declining submission to authority. Such public demonstration of authority maybe vital to their survival.
From the Vatican Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re said the attacks on Brazil's Catholic Church were unfair.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Freedom of Religion
Within the last year I have undergone a rather dramatic change in my attitude toward religion. Although, I recognized religion was pretty much all BS when I was fifteen, I simply avoided expressing my opinion in front of believers out of the misguided premise that you don’t make friends by pointing out how just stupid other peoples beliefs are. I definitely knew it wasn’t for me but I was willing to wilfully ignore the stupid ideas possessed by the religious crowd for the sake of social tranquility. Now, I think I was guilty of really underestimating my own ability to bring about positive changes in society and I was guilty of underestimating the ability of people to come out of the mental fog created by religion. Afterall, I was able to break free of the spell. Others are certainly just as capable of breaking free of the mental bondage as I was.
Yes, I know we have a constitutional guarantee protecting freedom of religion but that doesn’t mean that religion shouldn’t be criticised.
If religions have a justifiable role in society at all, (which I doubt), - but if they do, religions need to acknowledge the internal contradictions and negative social consequences that result from certain beliefs.
If religious people want to evolve spiritually they need to incorporate skeptism as a basis for their spiritual growth. They need to be honest with themselves about the absence of certainty. When people pretend to know more than what is humanly possible to know only trouble can result. Rather than surrendering to the notion of faith - an absolute certainty in “God” - surrender instead to our true uncertain condition in the material world and then work to expand the limits of our knowing. That’s how we have managed to leave behind the mind numbingly stupid, backward, brutality of the desert Abrahamic traditions.